Ethical (Dis)enchantment, Afflictive Kinship and Ebola Exceptionalism.

Date

2018-04-20

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Type

Book chapter

Peer reviewed

Abstract

This chapter begins with an ethnographic contribution from post-Ebola Sierra Leone, illustrating how in order to understand the differences between impairment, disease, and disability, there is a need to understand ‘ordinary ethics’. I begin by illustrating what this means through the unmaking of ethical practices during the Ebola epidemic in terms of, for example, caring relationships and social obligations of kinship. Secondly, I illustrate how post-Ebola disability as disablement is displayed as afflictive kinship when it is no longer possible to remake ethical life because bonds of kinship do not function. Thirdly, I give two examples of the ways in which a biomedical public reconstruction of social ethics has only led to disability and disablement for people living with consequences of Ebola.

Description

Keywords

Disability, Sierra Leone, Ebola, Ethics

Citation

Berghs, M. (2018) Ethical (Dis)enchantment, Afflictive Kinship and Ebola Exceptionalism. In: Thomas, G. & Sakellariou, D. (eds.), Disability, Normalcy, and the Everyday. New York: Routledge. pp.161–182.

Rights

Research Institute