Curating climate change: The Taipei Biennial as an environmental problem solver

Date

2020

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Intellect

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

This article analyses the curatorial practices behind the 2018 Taipei Biennial by considering its ethos of public engagement that fostered a merging of artistic means and civic aims. Entitled ‘Post-Nature: A Museum as an Ecosystem’, the biennial confronted the timely theme of environmental precarity and positioned itself as a substantive stakeholder in the public debate on climate change. It mobilised the biennial platform to marshal artists, community groups, conservationists and others, to spur on new thinking, and perhaps more importantly, to create solutions. By adopting this new role as an environmental problem solver, the biennial expanded itself from the ensconced space of aesthetic inquiry and sought to generate new forms of institutional relations and to nurture in its audience an ecological consciousness. These exhibition strategies underscore many international biennials’ self-assigned mandates to claim a socially relevant role and to adopt an interventionist posture. But while the biennial showcased multifaceted ecological visions of the present, it also delimited its range of critique and the possible modes of collective action. In this way, the exhibition becomes a valuable searchlight into the social and political relevance of global biennials, as well as their contention for legitimacy and significance as agents of social transformation.

Description

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.

Keywords

Contemporary art biennials, Taipei Biennial, curating, Post-nature, Climate change, Socially engaged art

Citation

Chao, J. and Kompatsiaris P. (2020) Curating Climate Change: The Taipei Biennial as an Environmental Problem Solver. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 7 (1), pp.

Rights

Research Institute