Adapting genetic algorithms for multifunctional landscape decisions: a theoretical case study on wild bees and farmers in the UK

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorBalzter, Heiko
dc.contributor.authorBreeze, Tom
dc.contributor.authorBrettschneider, Julia
dc.contributor.authorGirling, Robbie
dc.contributor.authorHagen-Zanker, Alex
dc.contributor.authorImage, Mike
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Colin
dc.contributor.authorLee, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorLovett, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorPetrovskii, Sergei
dc.contributor.authorVarah, Alexa
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, Mick
dc.contributor.authorYang, Shengxiang
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Emma
dc.date.acceptance2024-08-23
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T15:09:03Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T15:09:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-19
dc.descriptionopen access article
dc.description.abstract1. Spatial modelling approaches to aid land-use decisions which benefit both wildlife and humans are often limited to the comparison of pre-determined landscape scenarios, which may not reflect the true optimum landscape for any end-user. Furthermore, the needs of wildlife are often under-represented when considered alongside human financial interests in these approaches. 2. We develop a method of addressing these gaps using a case-study of wild bees in the UK, an important group whose declines may adversely affect both human economies and surrounding ecosystems. By combining the genetic algorithm NSGA-II with a process-based pollinator model which simulates bee foraging and population dynamics, Poll4pop, we ‘evolve’ a typical UK agricultural landscape to identify optimum land cover configurations for three different guilds of wild bee. These configurations are compared to those resulting from optimisations for farm income alone, as well as optimisations that seek a compromise between bee populations and farm income objectives. 3. We find that the land cover proportions in landscapes optimised for each bee guild reflect their nesting habitat preferences rather than foraging preferences, highlighting a limiting resource within the study landscape. The spatially explicit nature of these optimised landscapes illustrates how improvement for a given target species may be limited by differences between their movement range and the scale of the units being improved. Land cover composition and configuration differ significantly in landscapes optimised for farm income and bee population growth simultaneously and illustrate how human agents are required to compromise much more when the multifaceted nature of biodiversity is recognised and represented by multiple objectives within an optimisation framework. Our methods provide a way to quantify the extent to which real-life landscapes promote or compromise objectives for different landscape end-users. 4. Our investigation suggests that optimisation set-up (decision-unit scales, traditional choice of a single biodiversity metric) can bias outcomes towards human-centric solutions. It also demonstrates the importance of representing the individual requirements of different actors with different landscape-level needs when using genetic algorithms to support biodiversity-inclusive decision-making in multi-functional landscapes.
dc.funderNERC (Natural Environment Research Council)
dc.funder.otherUK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Landscape Decisions Programme
dc.funder.otherNERC SCENARIO DTP
dc.identifier.citationKnight, E. et al. (2024) Adapting genetic algorithms for multifunctional landscape decisions: a theoretical case study on wild bees and farmers in the UK. Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14424
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2086/24263
dc.language.isoen
dc.peerreviewedYes
dc.projectidNE/T002182/1, NE/V007831/1, NE/V007890/1
dc.projectidNE/S007261/1
dc.publisherWiley
dc.researchinstitute.instituteInstitute of Digital Research, Communication and Responsible Innovation
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAdapting genetic algorithms for multifunctional landscape decisions: a theoretical case study on wild bees and farmers in the UK
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MEE24.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main text
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supplement.pdf
Size:
7.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary document
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

School of Computer Science and Informatics