Defining, achieving, and evaluating collaborative outcomes: a theory of change approach
Date
2017-10-02
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Type
Article
Peer reviewed
Yes
Abstract
Governments have repeatedly claimed that collaboration improves public service outcomes. However, defining, achieving and evaluating collaborative outcomes is often problematic. Analysis of multi-sectoral projects in Wales, which were supported by the European Social Fund, exemplifies these challenges. Shifts in policy discourses and the interplay between national and local agendas produced complex and contested understandings of outcomes which made difficult to evaluate the projects’ achievements. We argue that the pursuit of collaboration needs to be understood not simply as an attempt to improve public service effectiveness but also ‘cultural efficacy’. The conclusions offer reflections relevant for theory and practice.
Description
This paper has been co-authored with colleagues at the Centre for Public Policy, Cardiff University
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.
Keywords
Collaboration, performance, theories of change, inter-governmental working
Citation
Guarneros-Meza, V., Downe, J.. and Martin, S. (2017) Defining, achieving and evaluating collaborative outcomes: a theory of change approach. Public Management Review, 20 (10), pp. 1562-1580