Defining, achieving, and evaluating collaborative outcomes: a theory of change approach

Date

2017-10-02

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

Governments have repeatedly claimed that collaboration improves public service outcomes. However, defining, achieving and evaluating collaborative outcomes is often problematic. Analysis of multi-sectoral projects in Wales, which were supported by the European Social Fund, exemplifies these challenges. Shifts in policy discourses and the interplay between national and local agendas produced complex and contested understandings of outcomes which made difficult to evaluate the projects’ achievements. We argue that the pursuit of collaboration needs to be understood not simply as an attempt to improve public service effectiveness but also ‘cultural efficacy’. The conclusions offer reflections relevant for theory and practice.

Description

This paper has been co-authored with colleagues at the Centre for Public Policy, Cardiff University The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.

Keywords

Collaboration, performance, theories of change, inter-governmental working

Citation

Guarneros-Meza, V., Downe, J.. and Martin, S. (2017) Defining, achieving and evaluating collaborative outcomes: a theory of change approach. Public Management Review, 20 (10), pp. 1562-1580

Rights

Research Institute