Self-authorship, well-being and paternalism

dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NC-NDen
dc.contributor.authorKalliris, K.en
dc.date.acceptance2015-10-07en
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-02T13:16:22Z
dc.date.available2018-11-02T13:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-11
dc.description.abstractPaternalism is the restriction of a person's autonomy for the good of that person. It embodies a familiar conflict of intuitions: while we cherish individual freedom, we also want to protect/promote what we know to be good. So, every paternalist must meet two challenges: paternalism must be justifiable as a restriction of autonomy as well as effective in terms of well-being. In this essay, I argue that the ‘autonomy’ restricted by paternalism is a Razian brand of free self-authorship and that the ‘good’ protected is captured by Martha Nussbaum's account of personal well-being. I then defend a mild welfare paternalism based on a dichotomy implicit in any defensible description of well-being. I argue that some aspects of the good life do not require endorsement and, therefore, can be justifiably and effectively promoted by autonomy-restricting means. Finally, I discuss why paternalism need not be hostile to ethical independence.en
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.identifier.citationKalliris, K. (2017) Self-Authorship, Well-being and Paternalism. Jurisprudence, 8:1, pp. 23-51en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2015.1116200
dc.identifier.issn2040-3313
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/17049
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.titleSelf-authorship, well-being and paternalismen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Self-authorship, well-being and paternalism-Final.pdf
Size:
368.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: