Contesting Science by Appealing to its Norms: Readers Discuss Climate Science in The Daily Mail.

Date

2012

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

1075-5470

Volume Title

Publisher

Sage

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

This study examines the rhetorical aspects of social contestation of climate change in reader comments published in the Daily Mail, subsequent to climategate. The following themes are reported: (1) denigration of climate scientists to contest hegemonic representations, (2) delegitimiza- tion of pro–climate change individuals by disassociation from science, and (3) outright denial: rejecting hegemonic social representations of climate change. The study outlines the discursive strategies employed in order to construct social representations of climate change, to contest alternative rep- resentations, and to convince others of the validity of these representations. It examines how social representations of science are formed, maintained, and disseminated.

Description

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.

Keywords

climate change, skepticism, communication, social media, social representations, public understanding, critical discourse analysis, social psychology

Citation

Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B. and Koteyko, N. (2012). Contesting Science by Appealing to its Norms: Readers Discuss Climate Science in The Daily Mail. Science Communication, 35 (3), pp. 383-410

Rights

Research Institute