The Pedagogy of Pulling Down Statues

Simple item page
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NCen
dc.contributor.authorHudson-Miles, Richard
dc.date.acceptance2020-12-04
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T15:00:15Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T15:00:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-04
dc.descriptionThis is a video essay delivered at the AMPS online conference Dec 2020. It can be watched on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KQ_LXyPVRw&t=3sen
dc.description.abstractOn 7th June 2020 protestors violently pulled down the statue of Edward Colston, erected in 1895 in the centre of Bristol, UK. A plinth that raised the sculpture above head height was mounted by protesters, who blindfolded the statue, lassoed ropes around its head and hauled it to the ground. The statue severed from its base upon impact and lay prostrated on the ground before the onrushing protesters. One protester placed his knee on its neck, mimicking the actions of Derek Chauvin as he killed George Floyd. Colston’s wealth, accumulated through the slave trade, has been central to urban development of Bristol. This spectacle of protest ruptured the status quo and forced normalised aspects of Britain’s colonial history back into question. Within days sister acts against monuments to slave owners, imperialists, and racists have subsequently appeared in cities across the world. These acts of iconoclasm are helping to recalibrate contemporary discourses around race. As this paper argues, these actions also serve a heuristic function which could be summarised as follows. 1) Threatening public sculptures forces a critical dialogue concerning national values and the ‘right to the city’ (Lefebvre 1968) 2) Threatening public statues starts a critical dialogue about imperialism, colonialism, and the naturalised histories of cities built on primitive accumulation 3) Threatening public statues raises awareness of public monuments which would otherwise be forgotten elements of the ‘representational space’ (Lefebvre 1974) of the consumer city 4) Because of the above, direct action against public monuments is not only an act of iconoclastic opposition to the ‘consensus system’ (Rancière 1999: 95) of neoliberal democracy, but the advent of a radically expanded, anarcho-democratic conception of the public university.en
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.identifier.citationHudson-Miles, R. (2020) ‘The Pedagogy of Pulling Down Statues’, Architecture, Media, Politics, and Society Conference ‘Teaching-Learning-Research Design And Environments’, Dec 2-4th, Manchester University / Manchester School of Architecture [online].en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KQ_LXyPVRw&t=3s
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2086/22421
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.publisherArchitecture, Media, Politics, and Societyen
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Art and Designen
dc.subjectarten
dc.subjectpedagogyen
dc.subjecticonoclasmen
dc.subjectpublic arten
dc.subjectstatuesen
dc.subjectColstonen
dc.subjectBack Lives Matteren
dc.titleThe Pedagogy of Pulling Down Statuesen
dc.typeConferenceen
dc.typeVideoen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Pedagogy of Pulling Down Statues.pdf
Size:
3.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
The video essay can be watched at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KQ_LXyPVRw&t=3s
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

School of Fashion and Textiles