"Saved!" by Jena Malone: An Introspective Study of a Consumer’s Fan Relationship with a Film Actress

Date

2011-03-05

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

0148-2963

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

While consumers have always been fascinated by the works and private lives of celebrities, some consumers experience a significantly more intensive level of admiration for a particular celebrity and, subsequently, become what are commonly known as fans. However, scant attention has been paid to how the relationship between fans and celebrities expresses itself in everyday consumer behavior. Thus, in order to explore celebrity fandom as a holistic lived experience from a fan’s insider perspective, the lead author uses subjective personal introspection to provide insights into his private fan relationship with the actress Jena Malone. Drawing on narrative transportation theory, the study finds that a consumer’s fan experiences may derive from one’s personal engagement with the celebrity’s artistic work and public persona. The latter is essentially the consumer’s private intertextual reading of what s/he perceives to be relevant and ‘reliable’ media texts, which can result in a feeling of ‘knowing’ the celebrity like a personal friend – or even of ‘love’.

Description

The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.

Keywords

Film Star Fandom, Parasocial Consumer-Celebrity Relationships, Human Brands, Narrative Transportation Theory, Autoethnography/Subjective Personal Introspection, Celebrity Fandom, Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Social anthropology/ethnography, Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics::Business studies, Research Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS::Cultural heritage and cultural production

Citation

Wohlfeil, M. and Whelan, S. (2012) Saved! by Jena Malone: An Introspective Study of a Consumer’s Fan Relationship with a Film Actress. Journal of Business Research, 65 (4), pp.511-519.

Rights

Research Institute