Collateral Benefits’ and the ‘International Community’: discursive realignment after the fall of Kabul

dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T09:22:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-15T09:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.description.abstractThis illustrated chapter offers an analysis of the use of the concept ‘international community’ as it was employed, after the fall of Kabul, by a variety of transnational social actors. The term, usually suggesting an objective, reputable body of transnational forces, has long been common currency in diplomatic circles. It is also replicated in the lingua franca shared by NGOs, the UN, academic institutions, think-tanks, and military formations. The positive value is carried by the reassuring word ‘community’, whereas ‘international’ refers to the global constitution and reach of the collective. The chapter examines the political machinations that inflected the various uses of an apparently positive and 'progressive' phrase, as the West made its calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan.en
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.identifier.citationPrice, Stuart (2022) Collateral Benefits’ and the ‘International Community’: discursive realignment after the fall of Kabul. In: Harbisher, Ben (editor) The Mediation of Sustainability: Development Goals, Social Movements, and Public Dissent,en
dc.identifier.isbn9781538161111
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2086/22111
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.publisherRowman and Littlefielden
dc.researchinstituteMedia Discourse Centre (MDC)en
dc.subjectInternational Communityen
dc.subjectRhetoricen
dc.subjectIntrusive Governanceen
dc.subjectRetrospective Humanitarianismen
dc.titleCollateral Benefits’ and the ‘International Community’: discursive realignment after the fall of Kabulen
dc.typeBook chapteren

Files

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: