Beyond normalisation and impairment: Theorising subjectivity for learning difficulties theory and practice

Date

2008

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

0968-7599
1360-0508

Volume Title

Publisher

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

Normalisation and social role valorisation continue to play a central role in shaping debates and practice relating to learning difficulties. In the context of recent arguments, this paper draws on the work of Foucault to deconstruct these theories. Foucault’s work alerts us to a conceptual confusion at their heart which reproduces a common but problematic individual-society dualism. There is an implicit, and problematic, presence in the theories of a pre-social individual conceived as having essential impairments, and who is passive in the face of negative socialisation. We propose that Foucault’s “ethical” domain of inquiry, with its concern for how people actively understand themselves and govern their conduct in relation to specific values and a “truth” that they are obliged to recognise in themselves, provides the basis for returning the individual-as-subject to theories in an active, critical manner.

Description

Keywords

Learning disability, Disability, Normalisation, Foucault

Citation

Yates, S., Dyson, S. and Hiles, D. (2008) Beyond normalisation and impairment: Theorising subjectivity for learning difficulties theory and practice. Disability & Society, 23 (3), pp. 247-258

Rights

Research Institute