Do we measure what should be measured? Towards a research and theoretical agenda for STI measurement in Africa

Date

2025-03-27

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

A persistent critique of standard science, technology and innovation (STI) indicators is that they remain reliant on concepts and theories transposed from the literature on STI in high-income countries. It is widely recognized that their relevance for African countries is limited, so we may not be measuring what we should be measuring, to promote development goals. To inform a shift from critique to building meaningful alternatives, the paper conducts a systematic review of the literature on STI measurement in Africa. The analysis highlights that STI measurement in Africa is under-researched, but the knowledge base is growing. The strongest trends relate to the adoption and extension of traditional standard STI indicators. More recent is a focus on environmental sustainability, digitalization and the informal sector, with most scholars based in South Africa and Nigeria. The main contribution is a research agenda to facilitate theory building as a foundation for designing contextually relevant STI indicators.

Description

open access article

Keywords

Science, technology and innovation indicators, measurement, Africa, bibliometric analysis, systematic review, developing countries

Citation

Kruss, G., Petersen, I., Sanni, M., Adeyeye, D. and Egbetokun, A. (2025) Do we measure what should be measured? Towards a research and theoretical agenda for STI measurement in Africa. Innovation and Development,

Rights

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Research Institute

Institute for Responsible Business and Social Justice