Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Study

Walsh, Denis; Spiby, Helen; McCourt, Christine; Grigg, Celia; Coleby, Dawn; Bishop, Simon; Scanion, Miranda; Culley, Lorraine; Wilkinson, Jane; Pacanowski, Lynne; Thornton, Jim

Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Study

dc.cclicence	CC-BY-NC	en
dc.contributor.author	Walsh, Denis
dc.contributor.author	Spiby, Helen
dc.contributor.author	McCourt, Christine
dc.contributor.author	Grigg, Celia
dc.contributor.author	Coleby, Dawn
dc.contributor.author	Bishop, Simon
dc.contributor.author	Scanion, Miranda
dc.contributor.author	Culley, Lorraine
dc.contributor.author	Wilkinson, Jane
dc.contributor.author	Pacanowski, Lynne
dc.contributor.author	Thornton, Jim
dc.date.acceptance	2020-01-08
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-09T15:50:08Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-09T15:50:08Z
dc.date.issued	2020-02-17
dc.description	The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. open access journal	en
dc.description.abstract	Objective: To identify factors influencing the provision, utilisation and sustainability of midwifery units (MUs) in England Design: Case studies, using individual interviews and focus groups, in six NHS Trust maternity services in England Setting & Participants NHS maternity services in different geographical areas of England Maternity care staff and service users from 6 NHS Trusts: 2 Trusts where more than 20% of all women gave birth in MUs, 2 Trusts where less than 10% of all women gave birth in MUs and 2 Trusts without MUs. Obstetric, midwifery and neonatal clinical leaders, managers, service user representatives and commissioners were individually interviewed (n=57). Twenty-six focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n=60) and service users (n=52). Main Outcome Measures: Factors influencing MU use Findings: The study findings identify several barriers to the uptake of MUs. Within a context of a history of obstetric-led provision and lack of decision-maker awareness of the clinical and economic evidence, most Trust managers and clinicians do not regard their MU provision as being as important as their obstetric unit (OU) provision. Therefore, it does not get embedded as an equal and parallel component in the Trust’s overall maternity package of care. The analysis illuminates how implementation of complex interventions in health services is influenced by a range of factors including the medicalisation of childbirth, perceived financial constraints, adequate leadership and institutional norms protecting the status quo. Conclusions: There are significant obstacles to MUs reaching their full potential, especially free-standing midwifery units (FMUs). These include the lack of commitment by providers to embed MUs as an essential service provision alongside their OUs, an absence of leadership to drive through these changes and the capacity and willingness of providers to address women’s information needs. If these remain unaddressed, childbearing women’s access to MUs will continue to be restricted.	en
dc.funder	NIHR (National Institute for Health Research)	en
dc.identifier.citation	Walsh, D., Spiby, H., McCourt, C., Grigg, C., Coleby, D., Bishop, S., Scanion, M., Culley, L., Wilkinson, J., Pacanowski, L., Thornton, J. (2020) Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Study. BMJ Open,	en
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033895
dc.identifier.issn	2044-6055
dc.identifier.uri	https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/19021
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.peerreviewed	Yes	en
dc.publisher	BMJ	en
dc.researchinstitute	Institute of Health, Health Policy and Social Care	en
dc.title	Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Study	en
dc.type	Article	en