Critical Discourse Analysis as a Review Methodology: An Empirical Example

dc.contributor.authorWall, Jeffreyen
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Bernd Carsten, 1968-en
dc.contributor.authorSalam, A.F.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-02T09:00:52Z
dc.date.available2015-09-02T09:00:52Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionAIS owns the copyright of the article and use for profit is not alloweden
dc.description.abstractResearch disciplines and subdisciplines are steeped in epistemological beliefs and theoretical assumptions that guide and constrain research. These beliefs and assumptions both enable scientific inquiry and limit scientific progress. Theory and review papers tend to be a means for reproducing ideological assumptions. However, review papers can also challenge ideological assumptions through critical assessment of taken-for-granted assumptions. Critical review methods are underdeveloped in the management disciplines. The information systems (IS) discipline must do more to improve the critical examination of its scientific discourse. This paper presents a method for systematically conducting critical reviews of IS literature based on Habermasian strains of critical discourse analysis. An empirical example of the method is provided. The empirical example offers a critical review of behavioral information security research with a focus on employees’ security behaviors.en
dc.explorer.multimediaNoen
dc.fundern/aen
dc.identifier.citationWall, J., Stahl, B. C. and Salam, A. F. (2015) Critical Discourse Analysis as a Review Methodology: An Empirical Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, Article 11en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03711
dc.identifier.issn1529-3181
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/11180
dc.identifier.urihttp://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/11
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.projectidn/aen
dc.publisherAssociation for Information Systemsen
dc.researchgroupCentre for Computing and Social Responsibilityen
dc.researchinstituteCentre for Computing and Social Responsibility (CCSR)en
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen
dc.subjectliterature reviewen
dc.subjecttheory and reviewen
dc.subjectinformation securityen
dc.subjectsecurity behavioren
dc.subjectideological hegemonyen
dc.titleCritical Discourse Analysis as a Review Methodology: An Empirical Exampleen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_Review_Methodology_CAIS (1).pdf
Size:
262.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: