The Four Day Work Week: A Chronological, Systematic Review of the Academic Literature

dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NCen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Timothy
dc.date.acceptance2023-04-05
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T15:51:36Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T15:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-13
dc.description.abstractDespite having been propounded for at least 50 years, the four-day work week (4DWW) has recently attracted global attention. The media headlines are dominated by the positive outcomes that can be expected by converting to a 4DWW. However, on examination the claims often have foundations that derive from reports published by advocacy groups and organisation’s self-reported results rather than scholarly research. This paper turns to the academic literature and uses a chronological, systematic review method to address the questions of what positives and negatives can be attributed to the 4DWW? Does the scholarly research support the popular contemporary claims? And what can be learned from more than 50 years of scholarly 4DWW publications that can inform future research? Drawing on 31 academic articles that specifically researched the 4DWW, the conclusions found that the majority demonstrated favourable results such as increased morale, job satisfaction, cost reductions and reduced turnover whilst negatives included performance measures and monitoring being intensified, scheduling problems, and that benefits may fade over time. The impact on productivity and the environment were inconclusive. Overall, the scholarly research paints a more complicated and ambiguous picture compared to that presented by 4DWW advocates and the media. More contemporary research utilising rigorous methodologies is required.en
dc.exception.ref2021codes254aen
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, T. (2023) The Four Day Work Week: A Chronological, Systematic Review of the Academic Literature Management Review Quarterly,en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00347-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2086/23194
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.researchinstitutePeople, Organisations and Work Institute (POWI)en
dc.subjectFour-day weeken
dc.subjectCompressed work weeken
dc.subjectFlexible working hoursen
dc.subjectAlternative work arrangementsen
dc.titleThe Four Day Work Week: A Chronological, Systematic Review of the Academic Literatureen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: