Does Improvisation Help or Hinder Planning in Determining Export Success? Decision Theory Applied to Exporting
dc.cclicence | CC-BY-NC | en |
dc.contributor.author | Nemkova, Ekaterina | en |
dc.contributor.author | Souchon, Anne L. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Paul | en |
dc.contributor.author | Micevski, Milena | en |
dc.date.acceptance | 2015-05-20 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-15T11:53:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-15T11:53:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description | The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Exporting enables organizations to diversify risk and generate multiple income streams. In turn, the ability to make good export decisions is purported to be a main determinant of performance. Although substantive export decisions are well researched, little is known about how export decisions should be made in practice and whether different decision-making approaches should be combined. This study addresses this gap using decision theory; the authors assess the interaction of planning and improvisation and examine the impact of these approaches on export responsiveness and export performance. They develop a conceptual model through exploratory research and test it through structural equation modeling. The authors seek insights into the results through post hoc in-depth interviews and conclude that improvisation has multiple dimensions (spontaneity, creativity, and action orientation) and that there is no one “best way” for export managers to make decisions. Furthermore, export planning can enhance economic performance but detract from customer performance. In addition, improvisation improves responsiveness, whereas action orientation leads to greater customer performance and results in greater responsiveness with regard to planning. However, export managers should be wary of spontaneity and creativity, because they detract from planning outcomes. | en |
dc.exception.reason | Note that the accepted version of this manuscript has been previously uploaded to the Durham University Online Repository within three months of the acceptance date prior to me joining De Montfort University. | en |
dc.exception.ref2021codes | 254a | en |
dc.explorer.multimedia | No | en |
dc.funder | n/a | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Nemkova, E., Souchon, A.L., Hughes, P. and Micevski, M. (2015) Does Improvisation Help or Hinder Planning in Determining Export Success? Decision Theory Applied to Exporting. Journal of International Marketing, 23 (3), pp. 41-65 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.14.0071 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2086/13091 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
dc.projectid | n/a | en |
dc.publisher | AMA journals | en |
dc.researchinstitute | Centre for Enterprise and Innovation (CEI) | en |
dc.subject | Exporting | en |
dc.subject | Decision-making | en |
dc.subject | Planning | en |
dc.subject | Improvisation | en |
dc.subject | Export performance | en |
dc.title | Does Improvisation Help or Hinder Planning in Determining Export Success? Decision Theory Applied to Exporting | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- ACCEPTED JIM 2015 NEMKOVA SOUCHON HUGHES MICEVSKI.doc
- Size:
- 551 KB
- Format:
- Microsoft Word
- Description:
- Main article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 4.2 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: