Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 inhibitor supplemented with gemcitabine treatment reduces the viability and fatty acid content of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro
Date
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Type
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Objective: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive cancer with ineffective treatment. Inhibition of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) suppresses cancer proliferation and might act as a novel chemotherapy supplement, but this has not been investigated in PC. Here, the effects of SCD1 inhibitor CAY10566 supplemented with gemcitabine treatment (gemcitabine+CAY10566) on PC cell viability, apoptosis, phenotype, fatty acid content, platelet-derived growth factor release, and cell size were investigated. Methods: Human PC cell line (PANC-1) was treated with SCD1 inhibitor CAY10566 with or without gemcitabine. Cell viability was assayed using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide and apoptosis and phenotype were determined using flow cytometry. Fatty acid content and platelet-derived growth factor release were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cell size was determined using scanning electron microscopy. Results: Half-maximal inhibitory concentration of gemcitabine or CAY10566 significantly reduced PANC-1 viability compared to gemcitabine alone (P<.0001). No significant differences in the phenotype of phosphatidylserine, tissue factor or basigin expression were detected at therapeutic doses (P>.05). Apoptosis was significantly increased following incubation with CAY10566 (P<.05). Fatty acid content of cells was significantly higher following gemcitabine treatment compared to CAY10566 alone or gemcitabine +CAY10566 (P<.05). Platelet-derived growth factor released by gemcitabine-treated cells was significantly increased compared to 142nM CAY10566 alone or gemcitabine+CAY10566 (P<.01). CAY10566 did not affect the size of isolated tumor cells but gemcitabine+CAY10566 significantly increased the size compared to the control (P<.05). Cell viability decreased significantly after the treatment with gemcitabine+CAY10566 compared with CAY10566 alone (P<.05) and gemcitabine alone (P<.01). However, when cycles of chemotherapy were mimicked and treatment was removed, the number of cell viability was significantly reduced (P<.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that CAY10566 may be a suitable supplement for gemcitabine chemotherapy for PC.