VANSec Attack Resistant VANETs Security Algorithm in terms of Trust Computation Error and Normalized Routing Overhead

dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sarmadullahen
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, S.en
dc.contributor.authorRehman, M. Uren
dc.contributor.authorIshtiaq, A.en
dc.contributor.authorAli, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBegum, S,en
dc.date.acceptance2018-06-04en
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-17T10:27:26Z
dc.date.available2018-07-17T10:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-16
dc.descriptionopen access articleen
dc.description.abstractVANET is an application and subclass of MANETs, a quickly maturing, promising, and emerging technology these days. VANETs establish communication among vehicles (V2V) and roadside infrastructure (V2I). As vehicles move with high speed, hence environment and topology change with time. There is no optimum routing protocol which ensures full-pledge on-time delivery of data to destination nodes, and an absolutely optimum scheme design for flawless packet exchange is still a challenging task. In VANETs, accurate and on-time delivery of fundamental safety alert messages (FSAMs) is highly important to withstand against maliciously inserted security threats affectively. In this paper, we have presented a new security-aware routing technique called VANSec. The presented scheme is more immune and resistive against different kinds of attacks and thwarts malicious node penetration attempts to the entire network. It is basically based on trust management approach. The aim of the scheme is to identify malicious data and false nodes. The simulation results of VANSec are compared with already existing techniques called trust and LT in terms of trust computation error (TCE), end-to-end delay (EED), average link duration (ALD), and normalized routing overhead (NRO). In terms of TCE, VANSec is 11.6% and 7.3% efficient than LT and trust, respectively, while from EED comparison we found VANSec to be 57.6% more efficient than trust and 5.2% more efficient than LT. Similarly, in terms of ALD, VANSec provides 29.7% and 7.8% more stable link duration than trust and LT do, respectively, and in terms of NRO, VANSec protocol has 27.5% and 14% lesser load than that of trust and LT, respectively.en
dc.exception.reasonThe output was published as gold open accessen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.identifier.citationAhmed, S., Rehman, M., Ishtiaq, A., Khan, S., Ali, A. and Begum, S. (2018) VANSec: Attack-Resistant VANET Security Algorithm in Terms of Trust Computation Error and Normalized Routing Overhead. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 6576841.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6576841
dc.identifier.issn1687-7268
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/16363
dc.language.isoenen
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.publisherHindawien
dc.researchinstituteCyber Technology Institute (CTI)en
dc.subjectVANETsen
dc.subjectSecurityen
dc.subjectError Estimationen
dc.titleVANSec Attack Resistant VANETs Security Algorithm in terms of Trust Computation Error and Normalized Routing Overheaden
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VANSec Attack Resistant VANETs Security Algorithm in terms of Trust Computation Error and Normalized Routing Overhead.pdf
Size:
2.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: