Interrogating Networks: Towards an Agnostic Perspective on Governance Research

Date

2015-01-01

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pion

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

Networks have rapidly become the dominant trope in governance theory and practice. While scholarship highlights important benefits, there has been insufficient systematic interrogation of the potential pathologies in network governance. This paper addresses the lacuna. We begin by discussing different kinds of network analysis and distinguishing the specific claims of network governance theory. We then pull together the scattered critically oriented literatures on the topic, identifying major problems with network modes of governance: hypocrisy, distrust, marketization, subjugation, antiproceduralism, fragmentation, and ‘netsploitation’. We finally argue for a more agnostic approach to governance research, capable of taking account of these pathologies and thereby putting networks in their place. This means avoiding the fetishisation of particular modes of governance and giving more careful attention to the settings in which they each can be useful.

Description

Keywords

networks, governance, critique

Citation

Davies, J. S. and Spicer, A. (2014) Interrogating Networks: Towards an Agnostic Perspective on Governance Research. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33 (2), pp. 223-238

Rights

Research Institute

Local Governance Research Centre (LGRC)
Centre for Urban Research on Austerity (CURA)