Collaborative open strategic planning: a method and case study

Date

2017

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

0959-3845

Volume Title

Publisher

Emerald

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show how collaborative information technology (IT) tools and a crowdsourcing model can be leveraged for the purpose of strategic planning. To achieve this objective, a formal method of open strategic planning (OSP) is proposed. Design/methodology/approach Based on a review of the literature a set of activities, stakeholders, and governing rules are identified in the form of an OSP method. The proposed planning method is implemented in a case study of strategic planning in an Australian university. Observations by the research team, and archival records were used to ascertain the relevance of the used method. Findings A method for OSP is presented and assessed. The method contains four phases: pre-planning, idea submission, idea refinement, and plan development. These phases cover the activities required from conceptualization to preparing and publishing the strategic plan. The findings clarify how the principles of OSP helped the organization to include more stakeholders and provided the opportunity to make the planning process transparent through use of a collaborative IT tool. Practical implications The study provides managers and planning consultants with detailed guidelines to implement the concept of open strategy. Originality/value This study is among the few to propose a method for OSP based on empirical research. The study also shows how collaborative IT tools can be used for high-level organizational tasks such as strategic planning.

Description

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.

Keywords

Open innovation, Strategy, Collaboration, Case study

Citation

Amrollahi, A. and Rowlands, B. (2017) Collaborative open strategic planning: a method and case study. Information Technology & People, 30 (4), pp. 832-852

Rights

Research Institute

Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility (CCSR)