Post-Unification Priorities for Probation: Former Practitioners' Perspectives
dc.cclicence | CC-BY | en |
dc.contributor.author | Parmar, Deena | |
dc.contributor.author | Nudd, Daniella | |
dc.date.acceptance | 2021-08-08 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T12:33:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T12:33:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-08 | |
dc.description | open access journal | en |
dc.description.abstract | Two former practitioners who recently moved to academia reflect on their experiences of working in probation and identify some priorities for the service post-unification. | en |
dc.funder | No external funder | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Parmar, D. and Nudd, D. (2021) Post-Unification Priorities for Probation: Former Practitioners' Perspectives. Probation Quarterly, 21. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.54006/JVMB1707 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2752-6933 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.probation-institute.org/news/post-unification-priorities-for-probation-former-practitioners-perspectives | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/21356 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.peerreviewed | No | en |
dc.publisher | The Probation Institute | en |
dc.researchinstitute | Institute for Research in Criminology, Community, Education and Social Justice | en |
dc.subject | Probation | en |
dc.subject | Unification | en |
dc.subject | Practitioners | en |
dc.title | Post-Unification Priorities for Probation: Former Practitioners' Perspectives | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- PQ21 Parmar and Nudd - Final Version.docx
- Size:
- 24.31 KB
- Format:
- Microsoft Word XML
- Description:
- PQ Article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 4.2 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: