Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParmar, Deena
dc.contributor.authorNudd, Daniella
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T12:33:31Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T12:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-08
dc.identifier.citationParmar, D. and Nudd, D. (2021) Post-Unification Priorities for Probation: Former Practitioners' Perspectives. Probation Quarterly, 21.en
dc.identifier.issn2752-6933
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.probation-institute.org/news/post-unification-priorities-for-probation-former-practitioners-perspectives
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/21356
dc.descriptionopen access journalen
dc.description.abstractTwo former practitioners who recently moved to academia reflect on their experiences of working in probation and identify some priorities for the service post-unification.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe Probation Instituteen
dc.subjectProbationen
dc.subjectUnificationen
dc.subjectPractitionersen
dc.titlePost-Unification Priorities for Probation: Former Practitioners' Perspectivesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.54006/JVMB1707
dc.peerreviewedNoen
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.cclicenceCC BYen
dc.date.acceptance2021-08-08
dc.researchinstituteInstitute for Research in Criminology, Community, Education and Social Justiceen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record