Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNathongchai, Raksachai
dc.contributor.authorRutty, Jane
dc.contributor.authorBrough, Alison
dc.contributor.authorAljanaahi, Nayef
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorRutty, Guy
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T11:51:09Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T11:51:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-26
dc.identifier.citationNathongchai, R., Rutty, J., Brough, A., Aljanaahi, N., Morgan, B. and Rutty, G. (2020) The use of mid-arm circumference for the estimation of adult body weight: A post mortem computed tomography approach. Forensic Imaging, 22, 200388.en
dc.identifier.issn2666-2256
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/19915
dc.descriptionThe file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Cadaver body weight (BW) is to be documented, where possible, in all forensic autopsy examinations.However, it may not always be possible to ascertain an accurate BW if, for example, functioning weighing equipment is unavailable or the body is incomplete. This research aimed to translate an adult clinical prehospital method which uses a mid-arm circumference (MAC) measurement to estimate BW to establish a post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) technique for adult cadaver BW estimation. Method: The clinical method was adapted for PMCT bone and soft tissue methods. Right and left MAC measurements were obtained by four independent observers from sixty-six (45 males and 21 females) consented research adult PMCT scans using the Osirix DICOM viewer. All observers rated MAC quality score on each arm from 0 (very poor) to 3 (good). Results: In the final group of fifty-five with MAC quality score ≥ 1, MAC measurements correlated well with actual BW (r=0.87) and yielded excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. There were no statistical differences between the two MAC methods, sexes or side of arm. Mean estimated BW by previous study Equation, BW=(4×MAC)-50, was 0.47 kg greater than mean actual BW with limits of agreement of 12.7 kg; this would be reduced to 9.2 kg if an outlier were excluded. Conclusions: The study identifies a quick and easy PMCT technique to estimate adult BW using PMCT. However, the result remains only an estimation and caution should be expressed if a result is applied to medico-legal cases.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectForensicen
dc.subjectPost Mortem Computed Tomographyen
dc.subjectBody weight estimationen
dc.subjectMid-arm circumferenceen
dc.titleThe use of mid-arm circumference for the estimation of adult body weight: A post mortem computed tomography approachen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2020.200388
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NC-NDen
dc.date.acceptance2020-05-25
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Health, Health Policy and Social Careen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record