Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Denis
dc.contributor.authorSpiby, Helen
dc.contributor.authorMcCourt, Christine
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, Celia
dc.contributor.authorColeby, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Simon
dc.contributor.authorScanion, Miranda
dc.contributor.authorCulley, Lorraine
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Jane
dc.contributor.authorPacanowski, Lynne
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Jim
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T15:50:08Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T15:50:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-17
dc.identifier.citationWalsh, D., Spiby, H., McCourt, C., Grigg, C., Coleby, D., Bishop, S., Scanion, M., Culley, L., Wilkinson, J., Pacanowski, L., Thornton, J. (2020) Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Study. BMJ Open,en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/19021
dc.descriptionThe file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. open access journalen
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify factors influencing the provision, utilisation and sustainability of midwifery units (MUs) in England Design: Case studies, using individual interviews and focus groups, in six NHS Trust maternity services in England Setting & Participants NHS maternity services in different geographical areas of England Maternity care staff and service users from 6 NHS Trusts: 2 Trusts where more than 20% of all women gave birth in MUs, 2 Trusts where less than 10% of all women gave birth in MUs and 2 Trusts without MUs. Obstetric, midwifery and neonatal clinical leaders, managers, service user representatives and commissioners were individually interviewed (n=57). Twenty-six focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n=60) and service users (n=52). Main Outcome Measures: Factors influencing MU use Findings: The study findings identify several barriers to the uptake of MUs. Within a context of a history of obstetric-led provision and lack of decision-maker awareness of the clinical and economic evidence, most Trust managers and clinicians do not regard their MU provision as being as important as their obstetric unit (OU) provision. Therefore, it does not get embedded as an equal and parallel component in the Trust’s overall maternity package of care. The analysis illuminates how implementation of complex interventions in health services is influenced by a range of factors including the medicalisation of childbirth, perceived financial constraints, adequate leadership and institutional norms protecting the status quo. Conclusions: There are significant obstacles to MUs reaching their full potential, especially free-standing midwifery units (FMUs). These include the lack of commitment by providers to embed MUs as an essential service provision alongside their OUs, an absence of leadership to drive through these changes and the capacity and willingness of providers to address women’s information needs. If these remain unaddressed, childbearing women’s access to MUs will continue to be restricted.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Openen
dc.titleFactors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: A Qualitative Research Studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033895
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderNIHR (National Institute for Health Research)en
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NCen
dc.date.acceptance2020-01-08
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Health, Health Policy and Social Careen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record