Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRahil, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorGammon, Rupert
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Neil
dc.contributor.authorUdie, Justin
dc.contributor.authorAkram, Muhammad Usman
dc.contributor.authorKhattak, Sanober
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T10:39:04Z
dc.date.available2019-10-10T10:39:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-23
dc.identifier.citationRahil, A., Gammon, R., Brown, N., Udie, J., Akram, M.U. (2019) Potential economic benefits of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction due to renewable energy and electrolytic hydrogen fuel deployment under current and long term forecasting of the Social Carbon Cost (SCC). Energy Reports, 5, pp. 602-618.en
dc.identifier.issn2352-4847
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/18606
dc.descriptionopen access articleen
dc.description.abstractThe 2016 Paris Agreement (UNFCCC Authors, 2015) is the latest of initiative to create an international consensus on action to reduce GHG emissions. However, the challenge of meeting its targets lies mainly in the intimate relationship between GHG emissions and energy production, which in turn links to industry and economic growth. The Middle East and North African region (MENA), particularly those nations rich oil and gas (O&G) resources, depend on these as a main income source. Persuading the region to cut down on O&G production or reduce its GHG emissions is hugely challenging, as it is so vital to its economic strength. In this paper, an alternative option is established by creating an economic link between GHG emissions, measured as their CO2 equivalent (CO2e), and the earning of profits through the concept of Social Carbon Cost (SCC). The case study is a small coastal city in Libya where 6% of electricity is assumed to be generated from renewable sources. At times when renewable energy (RE) output exceeds the demand for power, the surplus is used for powering the production of hydrogen by electrolysis, thus storing the energy and creating an emission-free fuel. Two scenarios are tested based on short and long term SCCs. In the short term scenario, the amount of fossil fuel energy saved matches the renewable energy produced, which equates to the same amount of curtailed O&G production. The O&G-producing region can earn profits in two ways: (1) by cutting down CO2 emissions as a result of a reduction in O&G production and (2) by replacing an amount of fossil fuel with electrolytically-produced hydrogen which creates no CO2 emissions. In the short term scenario, the value of SCC saved is nearly 39% and in the long term scenario, this rose to 83%.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseries;EGYR_2018_428_R1
dc.subjectSocial carbon costen
dc.subjectMiddle East and North Africaen
dc.subjectSurplus renewable energyen
dc.subjectCentral electrolyseren
dc.subjectEconomic benefitsen
dc.titlePotential Economic Benefits of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Reduction Due to Renewable Energy and Electrolytic Hydrogen Fuel deployment under current and Long Term Forecasting of the Social Carbon Cost (SCC)en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.05.003
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderNo external funderen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NC-NDen
dc.date.acceptance2019-05-08
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Energy and Sustainable Development (IESD)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record