Framing effects in public good games: Choices or externalities?
We disentangle the effects of choice (give vs. take) and externality (positive vs. negative) framing of decisions in isomorphic and payoff-equivalent experimental public good games. We find that, at the aggregate level, neither frame affects group contributions. At the individual level, the Take choice frame leads to greater free-riding, and also to somewhat higher contributions, i.e., to more extreme contribution behaviour.
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.
Citation : Cartwright, E. and Ramalingam, A. (2019) Framing effects in public good games: Choices or externalities?. Economics Letters, 179, pp. 42-45
Research Institute : Institute for Applied Economics and Social Value (IAESV)
Peer Reviewed : Yes