Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPortuese, Aurelienen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T15:52:41Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T15:52:41Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.identifier.citationPortuese, A. (2014) The Case for a Principled Approach to Law and Economics: Efficiency Analysis and General Principles of EU Law. In: Mathis, K. ed.Law and Economics in Europe: Foundations and Applications, Springer, pp.275-328en
dc.identifier.isbn9789400771093
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/13621
dc.description.abstractArche which in Ancient Greek means beginning or principle shows the common lineage between the study of principles and the beginning of a study: the enquiry into the nature of things starts, and should start, from the deciphering of the principles, be they of things or of law. This is also true for the general principles of law regarding the study of any legal order, and particularly of the EU legal order. Specifically, I shall demonstrate in this essay that the social influence those principles may have is to coherently formalise the EU judicial reasoning by the promotion of a notion of economic desirability when these principles are invoked. In other words, I shall argue that the principle of economic efficiency underpins each of the general principles of EU law analysed in this essay. For, the general principles of EU law as construed and interpreted by the EU judges are imbued with consequentialism rather moralism, with an analogical and practical reasoning rather than abstract reasoning, with an inductive rather than an deductive approach – in short, these principles are founded with pragmatism rather than with legalism. Indeed, the analysis of the general principles of EU law understood in their legal abstraction is neither relevant nor conclusive for a better understanding of the EU judicial reasoning. These principles are a mere conceptualisation of the EU judicial review in order to trim down the legal outcomes preferred in terms of the social consequences they (are supposed to) generate. This conceptualisation allows for an a posteriori legal justification to a legal outcome decided a priori. In sharp contrast to Wechsler’s argument that general principles of law encapsulate “what surely are the main qualities of law, its generality and its neutrality”, one can agree with Holmes who said, regarding the Common law judge, that judges “decide the case first and determines the principles afterwards”. Accordingly, after having delved into the plea that vouches for a more principled economic analysis of EU law (but also more generally of any legal orders) thatwould take place beyond the Dworkin-Posner dichotomy (1) and (2), I shall empirically scrutinize, through a casuistic analysis of the ECJ jurisprudence, the validity of the proposed approach of efficiency analysis of three general principles of EU law (3). I close the essay with some concluding remarks (4).en
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.subjectLaw and economicsen
dc.subjectEU principles of lawen
dc.subjectsubsidiarityen
dc.subjectlegal certaintyen
dc.subjectproportionalityen
dc.titleThe Case for a Principled Approach to Law and Economics: Efficiency Analysis and General Principles of EU Lawen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7110-9_12
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record