<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T07:34:32Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dora.dmu.ac.uk:2086/13261" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dora.dmu.ac.uk:2086/13261</identifier><datestamp>2023-09-20T19:19:09Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2086_2388</setSpec><setSpec>col_2086_2389</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="11c06a74-3ab3-460d-b4f2-efe54af1097b" confidence="-1">Herbane, B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2017-02-14T16:24:44Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2017-02-14T16:24:44Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2001</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/2086/13261</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en">Theory building in strategic management has traditionally suffered from strong&#xd;
demarcation lines. The case of the resource-based view of firm (RBV) which has&#xd;
emerged as an alternative approach to industry-based explanations of how&#xd;
organisations develop and sustain competitive advantage, particularly&#xd;
demonstrates this divide. Since then, these alternative views of competitive&#xd;
advantage have often been portrayed as mutually exclusive antagonists.&#xd;
This study sets out to examine the perceptions of strategic managers in the UK&#xd;
automotive components industry in relation to these two competing schools of&#xd;
thought which advocate advantage through resources (RBV) or advantage through&#xd;
residence (industry approaches). This industry has been chosen due to the clear&#xd;
potential for industry structure and internal competencies to influence competitive&#xd;
advantage. Using quantitative techniques, data from senior managers is analysed&#xd;
in order to establish the extent to which the views of industry practitioners&#xd;
converge or diverge with the theoretical or anecdotal offerings of the strategy&#xd;
literature.&#xd;
The findings of this thesis suggest that a complex hybrid of perceptions tends to&#xd;
prevail among respondents from the industry. This can be attributed to historical,&#xd;
operational and supply chain factors. Furthermore, the study finds that the lexicon&#xd;
of competitive advantage and the priorities of resources advocated in the literature&#xd;
are not shared by strategists in the industry. Accordingly, the study finds, strategic&#xd;
management theory in relation to the resource-based view requires further&#xd;
research using the methodology developed in this thesis as a foundation.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en">De Montfort University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="ddc" lang="en">658</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh" lang="en">Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en">Resources, autonomy and strategy : perceptions of competitive advantage in the UK automotive components industry.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en">Thesis or dissertation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" qualifier="qualificationlevel" lang="en">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" qualifier="qualificationname" lang="en">PhD</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="researchinstitute" lang="en">Centre for Enterprise and Innovation (CEI)</dim:field>open.access</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>