<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T13:16:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dora.dmu.ac.uk:2086/13244" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dora.dmu.ac.uk:2086/13244</identifier><datestamp>2025-06-04T14:20:42Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2086_2388</setSpec><setSpec>col_2086_2389</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Design and the formation of taste in the British printed calico industry, 1919 to 1940</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Baines, E.</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>This thesis examines the process and structures of the formation of taste and&#xd;
activation of fashion change within the British printed calico industry, from 1919-&#xd;
1940. The approach taken was to analyse the style trends, economic conditions and&#xd;
strategic policy of a number of case study companies. These case studies are&#xd;
contextualised by analysis of the broad structural and economic conditions in the&#xd;
industry, the interventions of Government and the contemporary ideological&#xd;
construction of pattern design.&#xd;
The thesis tests several historiographic views relevant to the structural analysis of&#xd;
taste formation. The assertion by the Balfour Committee in 1928 that the industry was&#xd;
divided into separate market and design style sections is investigated. A commonly&#xd;
held view that British interwar design was reactionary and regressive, and the general&#xd;
assumption that Modernism came to Britain in the 1930s as a Continental influence, is&#xd;
challenged. Definitions and perceptions of Modernism are closely examined. A range&#xd;
of contradictory claims regarding the sources of design innovation and fashion&#xd;
leadership in the industry are assessed. In addition, claims that the British interwar&#xd;
cotton industry was not innovative in its response to economic conditions and theories&#xd;
of a link between macroeconomic conditions and innovation are considered.&#xd;
In relation to the formation of taste, the thesis concludes that there was a separation in&#xd;
the fields of taste construction for furnishing and dress fabric, with different sources&#xd;
of design production, markets and design styles, although textile production for both&#xd;
sections could occur within the same company. In the case studies analysed, the main&#xd;
source of innovation and taste construction in printed textile design appears to have&#xd;
been company design studios, rather than freelance artists, architects, designers or&#xd;
Parisian design studios. The influence of the economic context was evident in the&#xd;
impact of specific cost rises, alteration of print processes used and changing market&#xd;
demand due to macroeconomic conditions and international competition. A switch in&#xd;
the basis of mass market demand from durability to fashion in textiles and clothing&#xd;
during the interwar period promoted a production structure of short production runs,&#xd;
small orders and a wide design range. A relevant factor in the construction of taste&#xd;
Was the Modernist educational aims of the British Government during the interwar&#xd;
period, particularly in the impact on general and designer education. It switched to a&#xd;
policy of promoting exhibitions of innovative Modernist design as a basis for creating&#xd;
demand in the 1930s, from a strategy that emphasised vertical integration of the&#xd;
textile industry to increase efficiency. The British printed textiles industry was&#xd;
innovative in its response to severe economic conditions, in terms of design, product&#xd;
development and the strategies of national printed textile industry organisations. A&#xd;
significant finding is the active role of the British printed textiles industry in initiating&#xd;
debate, producing exhibitions and developing designs that by 1919 had established a&#xd;
Modernist approach and visual language of decorative design. This version of&#xd;
Modernism was related to art-based concepts of form and expression, while also&#xd;
considering the design criteria of fitness to function. Dress fabric design - not hitherto&#xd;
seen as significant in the historiography of Modernism - was shown to have been&#xd;
strongly Modernist in emphasis in the case study companies examined. Modernism in&#xd;
pattern design appears to have been popular during the interwar period, rather than -&#xd;
as generally assumed - restricted to a small group of consumers with highly educated&#xd;
aesthetic tastes. These conclusions arise from and are substantiated by extensive&#xd;
empirical investigation of the design style and business history of case-study&#xd;
companies, supported by structural analysis of the industry.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>De Montfort University</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis or dissertation</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>PhD</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language xsi:type="dcterms:ISO639-2">en</dc:language>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy>http://hdl.handle.net/2086/13244</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dcterms:license>https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/9eb61ddd-6842-4637-bd98-4ae15b59ee52/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">4d7bfee79ecfc7ec4149dc1eee930a8e</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/286e47fe-9aeb-4a7d-8d17-58503e59be3a/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">b929c6f6bb02365247232e15722d7d7d</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/4eee2f00-a988-4143-9d06-841414052f1b/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">f4d097fa03ec20abdf09859bc86084e6</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/a8405463-62b6-46b2-bfea-c17478a5b5c1/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">8987d636e539976068eedeefd2e0d514</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:hasFormat>https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/7ea6cbdf-834a-4083-837b-34f49445bb46/download</dcterms:hasFormat>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">f184827a80df0266e1730420a9c9d0b8</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:hasFormat>https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/a5155297-b5e6-4a00-8a3e-cfeb4dfe978c/download</dcterms:hasFormat>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">dc07c8c06b6a3b2eaea2b27e2aba68a1</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:hasFormat>https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstreams/f50cebf7-357a-494e-8d30-9e44344f42d6/download</dcterms:hasFormat>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">3f81c95dceeec7a233df3172c98e9b01</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:subject xsi:type="dcterms:DDC">667</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>