Response to “The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics” by Michal Piekarski

Date

2016-07-09

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

ISSN

1187-7863
1573-322X

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Type

Article

Peer reviewed

Yes

Abstract

In this brief article we reply to Michal Piekarski’s response to our article ‘Facing Animals’ published previously in this journal. In our article we criticized the properties approach to defining the moral standing of animals, and in its place proposed a relational and other-oriented concept that is based on a transcendental and phenomenological perspective, mainly inspired by Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida. In this reply we question and problematize Piekarski’s interpretation of our essay and critically evaluate “the ethics of commitment” that he offers as an alternative.

Description

Open Access paid for by University of Vienna

Keywords

Animal Ethics, Moral Standing, Other, Moral Language, Virtue Ethics, Transcendental methodology, Essentialism, Heidegger, Levinas

Citation

Coeckelbergh, M. and Gunkel, D.J. (2016) Response to "The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics" by Michal Piekarski. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29 (4), pp. 717-721

Rights

Research Institute