Response to “The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics” by Michal Piekarski
Date
2016-07-09
Authors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
ISSN
1187-7863
1573-322X
1573-322X
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Type
Article
Peer reviewed
Yes
Abstract
In this brief article we reply to Michal Piekarski’s response to our article ‘Facing Animals’ published previously in this journal. In our article we criticized the properties approach to defining the moral standing of animals, and in its place proposed a relational and other-oriented concept that is based on a transcendental and phenomenological perspective, mainly inspired by Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida. In this reply we question and problematize Piekarski’s interpretation of our essay and critically evaluate “the ethics of commitment” that he offers as an alternative.
Description
Open Access paid for by University of Vienna
Keywords
Animal Ethics, Moral Standing, Other, Moral Language, Virtue Ethics, Transcendental methodology, Essentialism, Heidegger, Levinas
Citation
Coeckelbergh, M. and Gunkel, D.J. (2016) Response to "The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics" by Michal Piekarski. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29 (4), pp. 717-721