Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanner, Judithen
dc.contributor.authorPadley, Wendyen
dc.contributor.authorKiernan, Martinen
dc.contributor.authorLeaper, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorBaggott, Roben
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, Peteren
dc.identifier.citationTanner, J. et al. (2013) English hospitals under report SSIs. British Medical Journal 2013 pp. 346-345en
dc.description.abstractWe thank Lamagini and colleagues for their interest in our paper. These authors from the HPA claim that we are misinformed and lacking in understanding. Yet, our criticisms are the same as those expressed by the Public Accounts Committee and the DH Advisory Committee on HCAIs. Even the European Centers for Disease Control says the English SSI surveillance system ‘lags’ behind the rest of Europe. The SSI surveillance data published by the HPA does not include post discharge surveillance (save for readmission data in the mandatory scheme) which account up to 80% of SSIs. This results in the ‘true’ scale of SSIs being hugely under reported. As length of stay after surgery continues to fall this becomes ever more important. An SSI surveillance system which does not include post discharge surveillance is akin to describing the size of iceberg by measuring only the part seen above the water.en
dc.subjectsurgical site infectionen
dc.titleEnglish hospitals under report SSIsen
dc.researchgroupNursing and Midwifery Research Centreen
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Health, Health Policy and Social Careen
dc.researchinstituteLocal Governance Research Centre (LGRC)en

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record