Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMackay, R.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T07:32:34Z
dc.date.available2018-04-17T07:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-12
dc.identifier.citationMackay, R. (2018) Case Comment: Loake v Crown Prosecution Service. Criminal Law Review, 4, pp. 336-339.en
dc.identifier.issn0011-135X
dc.identifier.issn0011-135X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/16026
dc.descriptionThe file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.en
dc.description.abstractA comment on the Administrative Court's decision in Loke v CPS dealing with the scope of the insanity defence when pleaded in a summary trial.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen
dc.subjectHarassmenten
dc.subjectInsanityen
dc.subjectM'Naghten rulesen
dc.subjectStrict liabilityen
dc.subjectSummary trialen
dc.titleCase Comment: Loake v Crown Prosecution Serviceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.peerreviewedNoen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NDen
dc.date.acceptance2018-02-02en
dc.researchinstituteInstitute for Evidence-Based Law Reform (IELR)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record